All along, Herman Cain has been saying, “Let Herman be Herman.”
If that means continuing to tell an evolving story about the sexual harassment claims he now acknowledges he faced as CEO of the National Restaurant Association, it does not bode well for his presidential campaign.
But there’s no guarantee that Mr. Cain’s support – enough to put him at or near the top in polls of Republican voters – will slip, even now.
Cain is saying the fact that the restaurant group paid two women modest settlements to get rid of the harassment charge back in the 1990s as evidence that the case was not serious.
If no more explosive details come out, the story will likely fade.
Part of Cain’s appeal has been his management experience. This episode raises major red flags both about his ability to manage a crisis and about his ability to surround himself with an effective team of advisers.
“Forget about the 3 a.m. phone call, he’s not ready for the 9 a.m. phone call,” says Republican strategist Ford O’Connell.
And if more damaging information about Cain comes out, then his supporters may start shopping for another candidate who is not Mitt Romney, the other front-runner in the presidential primaries. Mr. Romney is seen as the “establishment” candidate in the race, a moderate at heart who takes conservative positions out of opportunism, not conviction.
If Cain supporters start considering the non-Romney alternatives, and determine there’s no one they can support, “then maybe they go to Romney,” says Mr. O’Connell, chairman of the conservative Civic Forum PAC.
Charlie Cook, editor of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report, thinks the sexual harassment story probably means the beginning of the end of the Cain surge. The likely beneficiary, he writes, is Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who earlier sank to single digits in the polls after bad debate performances. But Governor Perry remains viable, given his fundraising and organizational prowess.